Findex is my Financial Index.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
XLF vs FAZ
FAZ is a leveraged inverse ETF of the Russel 1000 financial index, for simplicity, we will use the S&P financial index tracking ETF XLF.
We want to examine trade-offs between options of these 2 tickers. Let us look at the Apr 2009 options for both. Since the financials is in a short-term down trend, let's compare the XLF put vs FAZ call options:
Volume
As of the end of the week the closest strike price option:
XLF - Apr Put 8 premium $0.79 volume 23877
FAZ - Apr Call 35 premium $7.70 volume 1339
Say we opened a bearish position on financial too early, we bought in at the open of Tues Mar 17th, 2009. XLF Apr put 8 had price about $0.95, while FAZ Apr call 35 had price about $12.50.
On Thu Mar 19th, 2009 open say we had enough pain and sell these at a loss, XLF Apr put 8 was priced around $0.40 and FAZ apr call 35 had price about $4.00
Now let's say we did not close the position and waited for a reversal. As of Friday's close their prices are $0.79 & $7.70 respectively.
In period 1: XLF changed -58% falling from $0.95 to $0.40 per contract.
FAZ changed -68% falling from $12.50 to $4.00 per contract.
In period 2: XLF changed 97.5% rising from $0.40 to $0.79 per contract.
FAZ changed 92.5% rising from $4.00 to $7.70 per contract.
Combined period: XLF Apr call 8 lost $0.16 (16.8%) and FAZ Apr put 35 lost $4.80 (38.4%)
While XLF the ETF itself went from $7.80 to $9.60 to $8.14, a net of -4.18% on the short side. The FAZ ETF went from $45 to $23.88 to $ 35, a net of -22%
Supposed we open a FAZ contract, representing 100 shares @ $45, shares total $4500. Since this is to perform -3X of XLF, so I would need to short $13500 woth of XLF in order to get the similar performance.
Approximately 17 contracts are needed @$0.95 = $1615, after period 1, it was down to $680 and back to $1343, losing $935 in period 1 and $272 in combined period.
For the FAZ contact, during period 1 it lost $8.50 from $12.50 to $4, in the combined period it lost $480.
It looks like FAZ lost less when it in opposite trend and gain less when it reverses. However the main reason was that the strike price of 35 was $10 deeper in the money than the closest strike price call option.
Bid/Ask Spread: FAZ Apr call 35 has current spread of $0.20 while XLF Apr put 8 has current spread of $0.05, if we purchase 17 of these, the total lost on spread will be $85. Plus $16 higher in commission eacy trip.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Monday, March 16, 2009
Friday, March 13, 2009
Newly Created Indicators for XLF
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Update
Today my SRS & my FAZ from profitable to be come losses, fortunately my DXO is hedging against it and I suffer a minor loss. If I set my hard stop loss earlier I would have broken even. XLF has ran up rather quickly and already reached its 50% retracement from the top of wave 3 of 5. It is also at the low point of wave 1 of 5.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Financials
I have been follow financials lately since it has its own defined trend and it tends to lead the overall market. Today we wouldn't want to be holding FAZ in our portofolios as it plunged around 40% today. Although many are loading up the FAZ but I still think it can go down a little more. It's currently around $60 a piece.
I was actually anticipating this huge sell off in FAZ sparked by this rally. Below the blue oval indicates where I bought in FAZ put 80, and the purple is where I gave up when it lost half of its value. However if I held on to it until today, I would have gotten a gain instead.
Let's review what went wrong, XLF is making lower lows each day and I kept the bleeding going until I gave up. Notice if price is making daily lows everyday, I would be able to set a safe stop-loss point. The desired locations are the blue arrows, with stop being previous low.
I personally think the market can head higher these few days so I am waiting for a lower entry on FAZ.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Practice Account
Monday, March 2, 2009
New low on XLE, XLV continues to break down
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)